Viewpoint: N. Hempstead should regulate, not ban short-term rentals

3
Viewpoint: N. Hempstead should regulate, not ban short-term rentals

The North Hempstead Town Board will be taking up a resolution to effectively ban short-term rentals like AirBnB. That would be a mistake.

Those of us who travel appreciate how travel – more than anything (including reading books, banned or not, or listening to lectures by individuals banned or not) – opens minds, broadens perspectives, builds bridges and increases understanding. This is, in fact, one of the unique and important benefits of tourism that goes beyond the economic benefits that sustain a community. Travelers become ambassadors of sorts, whether going to a “foreign” country or another state or another community.

We hear all the time how tourists are derided as being too insulated behind gates of posh resorts or some fancy commercial hotel to be a benefit to the local community.

Short-term rentals, especially like AirBnB (the most visible and regulated form of short-term rentals), change that. It brings people into neighborhoods where they can really “meet the people,” see what communities and culture are really like.

Just recently, as Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman signed a sister city and friendship agreement with Northern Jerusalem (Israel), he pointed to the desirability of “building bridges,” to which Northern Jerusalem Governor Israel Ganz said “I hope you will use it to come.” Friendship, relationships, understanding and bridges – personal and economic – come from personal contact.

Now, North Hempstead is hardly a tourist destination so out-of-towners coming here are likely coming for family, friends, business, perhaps medical treatment or to support a patient in one of our world-class hospitals, or perhaps for a weeks-long contract as a traveling nurse or health provider, a university lecturer or researcher, a business consultant, or possibly to survey the place to relocate altogether or start a business.

AirBnBs – essentially renting a room or even an entire house – make that possible. The facilities – very, very different from commercial hotels or motels – are ideal for families and particularly multi-generational families traveling together and people who are essentially wanting to live in a neighborhood.

At a recent hearing, there were several people who complained about “outsiders” driving fast through their quiet streets, holding parties. Gosh, that sounds like just about everybody’s teenager. In fact, I question whether these complaints had anything to do with an AirBnB guest at all since guests have to be vetted and basically approved by the host, who also is vetted and approved by AirBnB to meet standards, and everybody rates everybody else. A host won’t accept a booking from someone who has received bad reviews, as one of the people who spoke at the hearing, who in fact is an AirBnB host, noted.

Short-term rentals like AirBnB provide a valued addition to communities, especially ones that are not in a tourist or commercial center.

Airbnbs afford a lodging experience that is very different from commercial hotels – in the first place, they offer the convenience of a home – with kitchen, multiple bedrooms, laundry facilities and the like.

As this woman noted, the guests who use AirBnB typically are coming to North Hempstead for some family or special occasion – a wedding, bar mitzvah, graduation or such. Most of the guests have ties to the community, or may even have been former residents (your former neighbors).

As she pointed out, out-of-towners are good for a local economy – they are literally cash cows – dining out, shopping. Every dollar spent by a visitor ripples four times through a local economy.

I’ve stayed in AirbnBs in a small town in California, and an AirBnB was a godsend when a blizzard hit when we arrived at Capital Reef in Utah. It sidetracked our plan to do “wild camping,” but we were cozy, safe and warm in a lovely house just outside the park.

There are huge advantages for property owners. Some people may be empty-nesters like this woman who is renting out a room rather than the whole house. These people not only provide revenue so that the empty-nester can continue to afford to keep the house but companionship.

Others might be snowbirds whose homes would otherwise be vacant and abandoned for six months. How is that a benefit to the neighborhood to have a home vacant for months? AirBnB hosts hire housekeepers or local managers, paid for out of the guest fees, to maintain the property (added benefit of creating jobs).

There are some negatives to short-term rentals. One is the complaint that by keeping a house off the market that would otherwise be sold, it limits housing stock and keeps housing costs high. That might be true, but on the other hand, it keeps home values up, which benefits you if you are the seller.

I personally don’t see a problem with people coming and going after three or four days or so – thus the turnover.

But the problems could be and should be mitigated – just as the accessory housing issue should be.

Short-term rental property owners like AirBnB should be required to register – a practice perhaps that renewed every few years – and be inspected for health and safety. The town could create code that also sets fines for various breaches – sanitation, noise pollution, public nuisance – and even pull a license or registration for repeated offenses. If the situation gets out of hand, there could be further regulations, including on the number of properties at any one time that could get such a license or registration. The town could even impose a hospitality tax for short-term rentals.

But weighing both sides – and the fact that housing costs are on the other side of the ledger from home values – the benefits outweigh the negatives, just as tourism, when done responsibly and sustainably, is a huge boon for a community.

My understanding is that this item will be back on North Hempstead’s agenda at its Sept. 22 meeting. The board should not ban short-term rentals, but instead properly regulate them.

No posts to display

3 COMMENTS

  1. Agree. License and inspect and it will be a plus to seniors and others who need to supplement their income to pay the Hugh taxes in Long Island

  2. https://news.airbnb.com/airbnb-introduces-new-anti-party-technology-in-us-and-canada/
    New anti-party technology in the US and Canada
    By Airbnb • August 16, 2022
    • Company
    Key Takeaways
    • We’re announcing the introduction of new anti-party tools in the US and Canada to help identify potentially high-risk reservations and prevent those users from taking advantage of our platform
    In June, we announced that our previously temporary ban on parties will become a codified policy. We are continuing our work to enforce that policy by taking measures trying to the best of our ability to take on unauthorized parties — meaning parties thrown without the knowledge or consent of Hosts. It’s integral to our commitment to our Host community — who respect their neighbors and want no part of the property damage and other issues that may come with unauthorized or disruptive parties.
    To that end, today we’re announcing the introduction of new anti-party tools in the US and Canada to help identify potentially high-risk reservations and prevent those users from taking advantage of our platform. For example, this system looks at factors like history of positive reviews (or lack of positive reviews), length of time the guest has been on Airbnb, length of the trip, distance to the listing, weekend vs. weekday, among many others. The primary objective is attempting to reduce the ability of bad actors to throw unauthorized parties which negatively impact our Hosts, neighbors, and the communities we serve.
    A similar variation of this system has been piloted in Australia since October 2021, where it’s been very effective. We have seen a 35 percent drop in incidents of unauthorized parties in the areas of Australia where this pilot has been in effect. We are now ending the pilot phase in Australia and codifying this product nationwide. We are hoping for similar success as we begin testing this in the US and Canada.
    This anti-party technology is designed to prevent a reservation attempt from going through. Guests who are unable to make entire home bookings due to this system will still be able to book a private room (where the Host is more likely to be physically on site) or a hotel room through Airbnb.
    This system is a more robust and sophisticated version of the “under-25” system that has been in effect in North America since 2020, which focuses primarily on guests under the age of 25 without positive reviews who are booking locally. We anticipate that this new system will help prevent more bad actors on our platform while having less of a blunt impact on guests who are not trying to throw a party. While we are consistently willing to make trade-offs in the interests of building trust, our goal is to make these systems as precise and fair as possible to support our Hosts and guests.
    While we are optimistic that this technology will have a positive impact for the safety of our community and our goal to reduce unauthorized parties — we want to be clear that no system is perfect. We work hard to deter bad actors from using our platform, but ultimately Airbnb is an online platform that facilitates real world connections. That’s why we continually seek to partner with experts and communities to complement their safety efforts, and we continue to invest in our Neighborhood Support Line to facilitate direct communication with neighbors regarding potential parties in progress or concerns with any nearby listings.
    We will communicate with transparency about the results of this testing phase and the next steps of our ban on parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here